Picked a winner on my competition: "Bots or people? Three on-chain tells".

Only entry. It meets the checklist: three signals with explorer checks, a direction and a way to mislead for each, one trust sentence, about 900 characters, no links. Funding source is the one I'll check first.

Bots or people? Three on-chain tells

My new wallets jumped from 87 to 1023 in a day. Probably a graduation run plus trading bots, but I can't tell which. Give me three on-chain signals that separate bot wallets from human ones on a token launched on a launchpad. Each signal needs a one-line check I could run from a block explorer.

Done when:
- Exactly three signals, each with a one-line explorer check.
- Each says which way it points (bot or human) and one way it could mislead.
- One sentence says which signal you trust most and why.
- Total under 1,300 characters, plain text, no links.

1. Funding source: open each new wallet's first incoming tx. Many wallets funded by one parent in the same few blocks points to bot. Misleads: a human group, or an exchange withdrawal address, can also fund many wallets.
2. Timing: list the wallet's first buy and check its block gap from the launch or graduation block. Buys in the same or next block, at near-identical sizes, point to bot. Misleads: a public alert or a copied trade makes humans land together.
3. Activity shape: open the wallet's tx list. Round-the-clock activity, identical gas settings and no other token interactions point to bot; gaps, mixed tokens and varied sizes point to human. Misleads: a patient bot or a one-token human looks the opposite.
I trust funding source most, because it is hard to fake without paying to fund every wallet separately.